ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on forum.kingstonian.net

The K's In Point

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Quiz - Friday 29th June by TaimourToday 18:44Today at 18:44:45view thread

Oldest article: Kingstonian 1-2 Leatherhead by www.kingstonian.com1/4/2017 17:28Sat Apr 1 17:28:35 2017view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: NO MINIBUS to Lowestoft... by yorkey10/10/2017 12:07Tue Oct 10 12:07:26 2017view thread

The Kingstonian sign

By Taimour (MainStandK)9/10/2017 18:29Mon Oct 9 18:29:21 2017

Views: 686

About 2 weeks ago the large Kingstonian sign from the main stand at kingsmeadow was taken down. Is the club keeping it?

reply to this article | return to the front page

8 people like this 8 people   

Re: The Kingstonian sign

By Paddy (Paddy1)10/10/2017 15:05Tue Oct 10 15:05:01 2017In response to The Kingstonian signTop of thread

Views: 535

It's being moved to New Plough Lane & being used as a door mat, so they can continue to wipe their feet on us.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: The Kingstonian sign

By LiamKs10/10/2017 20:54Tue Oct 10 20:54:37 2017In response to Re: The Kingstonian signTop of thread

Views: 451

Maybe thats right.AFC do wat they want including there historic cup win wen they were not even formed.
MKDons have the history not AFC.
Don't like it maybe but it is at it is Wimbledon do not exist any more it is AFC WIMBLEDON not anything else.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people   

Re: The Kingstonian sign

By a krinkly10/10/2017 16:46Tue Oct 10 16:46:27 2017In response to Re: The Kingstonian signTop of thread

Views: 528

Sadly I think it's far more likely that Chelsea have had the sign scrapped since it's obviously them who've removed it just before their first game on 24th September.



Meldrew - with attitude!

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: The Kingstonian sign

By supahoops710/10/2017 06:06Tue Oct 10 06:06:16 2017In response to The Kingstonian signTop of thread

Views: 555

Should have been left where it was to remind all those pretentious
buggers watching Chelsea ladies and some AFC supporters who poured
Scorn our our demise, where their ready made stadium came from.
Not enough of the facts concerning our departure has been reported
in the press IMO. I guess if you asked someone from Chelsea if they
supported grass roots or lower league football, they would have to say
NO. Wouldn't they?

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people   

Re: The Kingstonian sign

By NorbitonKs10/10/2017 06:55Tue Oct 10 06:55:17 2017In response to Re: The Kingstonian signTop of thread

Views: 527

Spot on.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: The Kingstonian sign

By NorbitonKs9/10/2017 19:11Mon Oct 9 19:11:32 2017In response to The Kingstonian signTop of thread

Views: 620

I should bloody well hope so.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Previous thread: Burgess Hill Town report by www.kingstonian.com9/10/2017 23:31Mon Oct 9 23:31:41 2017view thread