ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on forum.kingstonian.net

The K's In Point

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Metropolitan Police and South Park game update… by ollieYesterday 14:09Yesterday at 14:09:54view thread

Oldest article: SUNDAY by tim25/10/2019 18:50Fri Oct 25 18:50:34 2019view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Saturdays line up? by BE8/1 14:19Wed Jan 8 14:19:22 2020view thread

Moving on (Louie who?)

By a krinkly6/1 09:56Mon Jan 6 09:56:20 2020

Views: 1168

We can spend the week endlessly exploring the possible implications surrounding the exit of this seasons top scorer, or start to concentrate on something important, Saturday. No doubt there'll be some hefty changes in training this week, I trust the Gaffer to optimise what we have, can we still win it? Yes.

As for the other stuff, the board will deal with anything that needs dealing with.

Edited by a krinkly at 10:05:09 on 6th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   1 person dislikes this 1 person

Re: Moving on

By Paddy (Paddy1)6/1 10:08Mon Jan 6 10:08:28 2020In response to Moving on (Louie who?)Top of thread

Views: 1013

We can do both at the same time.

But on the 'moving on' side of things... we need to replace Louie with an equally potent striker who is known & feared at our level (or above) as soon as possible. Assuming there wasn't any pay off to do this with it could be a difficult task.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By a krinkly6/1 10:11Mon Jan 6 10:11:54 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 998

Finding someone not Trophy tied (if still appropriate) won't be easy, in the meantime I'm expecting to see some interesting positioning on Saturday.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By Paddy (Paddy1)6/1 12:43Mon Jan 6 12:43:26 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 846

I reckon the club should forget about finding someone with the Trophy in mind if it would be quicker to get someone in who is Cup-tied. The cup runs have been lovely & has put some good money into the club but getting up to the Conference South by any means possible (except for giving an under qualified manager a blank cheque book like we did last season) has to be the priority?

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By Iang6/1 13:50Mon Jan 6 13:50:02 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 853

Callum Davis , he of the blinding finishes. He may not be as potent as L but as least he's not a Judas .

One of the most painful defections for me since Sol C .

reply to this article | return to the front page

   1 person dislikes this 1 person

Re: Moving on

By supahoops76/1 13:52Mon Jan 6 13:52:52 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 835

Stick Jerry Puemo up there and use him
as a battering ram.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By a krinkly6/1 13:14Mon Jan 6 13:14:54 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 840

Move somebody forward from midfield and supply more service than before? There's a lot of talent still in the side.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people   3 people dislike this 3 people

Re: Moving on

By Vicky (Alan L.)6/1 12:47Mon Jan 6 12:47:22 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 835

Sounds like a sensible course of action. A really good seasoned forward would be likely cup tied at this point in the season anyway.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By K's19606/1 11:41Mon Jan 6 11:41:57 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 906

A very good point, spot on. I have every confidence in the manager coming up with a plan B and K's will win emphatically on Saturday. COYK's

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By Ohdear (Ksuals)6/1 11:45Mon Jan 6 11:45:46 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 895

Is not part of being a football supporter to speculate,wonder discuss all things to do with your club? Goodness where would we be without feisty disagreement on this forum?

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   1 person dislikes this 1 person

Re: Moving on

By BE6/1 12:16Mon Jan 6 12:16:50 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 864

This really does stink, getting away from football etc.etc. Goes for the money at Romford! To be honest I have really thought that at times he didn't seem to be in the game and too easily 'disappeared'. Why oh why no transfer fee, valued at £25,000.

Edited by BE at 12:17:46 on 6th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Moving on

By Ksforlife856/1 13:16Mon Jan 6 13:16:39 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 817

This what I don’t understand if wants to go and get more money fine least be honest with us fans and for the board just to rip up his contract and let walk out for nothing that’s bad Business just don’t make sense

Edited by Ksforlife85 at 13:17:28 on 6th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   1 person dislikes this 1 person

Re: Moving on

By Vicky (Alan L.)6/1 12:30Mon Jan 6 12:30:25 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 845

Agree it stinks. But 25k at our level? Who has that kind of money. Plainly not even Tamplin.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By Taimour (WeHateWombles)6/1 13:13Mon Jan 6 13:13:43 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 819

I think we could have got 10k out of tamplin.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By reximus6/1 13:16Mon Jan 6 13:16:35 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 795

I'm completely at a loss to understand how we apparently failed make him sign a non-compete clause as part of his exit from the Club?

rex

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Moving on

By a krinkly6/1 13:12Mon Jan 6 13:12:21 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 813

If this does turn out to be as devious as it appears, then despite the fact we've had plenty of 'money grabbing' ex players over the years this is on a different level. McKimm could be knocked of his perch as arch villain.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Moving on

By Olde School Ks (OldSchoolKs)6/1 12:49Mon Jan 6 12:49:29 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 842

25k or not,he was on a contract which we seem to have released him from overnight.
I am sure we have faith in the boss but wonder if the wool was pulled over his eyes or if he just thought it best to let go.Contract or no contract if a player at any level wants out,it then gets very difficult and messy to try and hold them.
We would not want a player of such importance to be playing on Saturday if his mind was somewhere else.

reply to this article | return to the front page

5 people like this 5 people   

Re: Moving on

By BE6/1 15:04Mon Jan 6 15:04:51 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 773

Louis once stated he was a Conference player so why go lower unless it was for the money and being further away from his family at Romford.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By Ohdear (Ksuals)6/1 15:23Mon Jan 6 15:23:56 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 755

If as you say BE he sees himself as a conference player,and he plays at a lower level for the money,and if it is true as some are saying he left for the money at least he then would be consistent.
If playing football for the money is a strong motivation then playing for Ks I' m afraid is a distant 2nd.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By Peter Borrett6/1 16:34Mon Jan 6 16:34:51 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 783

We have forwards who have been patient and deserve their chance. I am sure they will give a 100 percent in the next few games proving worthy of that chance. Leamington top scorer Josh March has also left at the weekend joining Forest Green Rovers. It maybe a game where both teams adjust their playing formations.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Moving on

By John Bangs6/1 19:10Mon Jan 6 19:10:04 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 687

Apparently (according to Forest Green Rovers) he has scored 24 goals in 27 games so far this season which is one more than the rest of the Leamington team put together.

Louie has scored 18 compared to 41 from the rest of the Ks team

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Moving on

By Ali (ali.kazemi)6/1 19:29Mon Jan 6 19:29:36 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 678

At least we're both without our main strikers going in to the match. One key difference though is that at least Leamington got a transfer fee as compensation for their man.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people   

Re: Moving on

By a krinkly6/1 16:46Mon Jan 6 16:46:20 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 741

It should be a good fiesty match, hopefully the crowd a bit bigger than the last round since Leamington are bringing nearly as many as Woking did.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By Ali (ali.kazemi)6/1 18:44Mon Jan 6 18:44:34 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 722

If Leamington aren't bringing as many as Woking, the crowd will definitely be smaller.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By a krinkly6/1 19:40Mon Jan 6 19:40:35 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 707

It's the secnd round, crowds do increase anyway as the rounds progress.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By Ali (ali.kazemi)6/1 19:58Mon Jan 6 19:58:21 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 691

Let's hope you're right.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By Alastair6/1 17:06Mon Jan 6 17:06:21 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 745

Where's your Leamington travelling supporters info from? I'd be astonished - and delighted - if that turns out to be true

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By a krinkly6/1 17:08Mon Jan 6 17:08:50 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 763

This forum, Leamington are reckoning on bringing 150, the Cards had 200 at the most probably a bit less.

http://forum.kingstonian.net/article/150741

Edited by a krinkly at 17:16:29 on 6th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Moving on

By ollie7/1 16:32Tue Jan 7 16:32:52 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 646

No trains between Clapham Junction and any of Tolworth, Surbiton or Kingston lines on Saturday. I expect this will have an impact for some.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Moving on

By Olde School Ks (OldSchoolKs)7/1 17:34Tue Jan 7 17:34:40 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 562

Oh no not again

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Moving on

By BE8/1 14:03Wed Jan 8 14:03:38 2020In response to Re: Moving onTop of thread

Views: 485

Well I will not be coming, can only travel by train (Excuse for family commitments etc.)

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Previous thread: Flags for Trophy Match by John Bangs4/1 23:42Sat Jan 4 23:42:34 2020view thread