ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on forum.kingstonian.net

The K's In Point

Return to front page

Newest article: Isthmian League - Premier Division result by Football Web PagesYesterday 21:37Yesterday at 21:37:45view thread

Oldest article: Worthing 2-1 Kingstonian by www.kingstonian.com29/9/2019 14:43Sun Sep 29 14:43:27 2019view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: BetVictor Isthmian Premier Division result by Football Web Pages27/1 21:44Mon Jan 27 21:44:08 2020view thread

Sign number 4

By Taimour (WeHateWombles)25/1 20:51Sat Jan 25 20:51:00 2020

Views: 786

The small K's sign that was up near the tea bar was ripped down last week (you can see where it has been prised off). That makes four signs that have gone missing or been vandalised. Plus the shipping container was broken into. I spoke to two Casuals volunteers today who were really friendly and welcoming - but i don't understand why there is no public or private effort to rein in their thuggish element.

reply to this article | return to the front page

5 people like this 5 people   

Re: Sign number 4

By KsOllie26/1 08:58Sun Jan 26 08:58:01 2020In response to Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 622

Is anything being done or we letting them get away with this. It’s actually embarrassing.

It’s funny how Corinthian Casuals Twitter has been quiet about this. Clearly there happy for a few to embarrass themselves and the clubs reputation. Hope we beat them in February and April.

reply to this article | return to the front page

5 people like this 5 people   

Re: Sign number 4

By Vicky (Alan L.)25/1 22:06Sat Jan 25 22:06:52 2020In response to Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 650

Was stock taken from the container? If so this is theft and the police should be involved. Sadly I doubt they would be too interested in the idiotic vandalism.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Sign number 4

By jon tolley25/1 22:15Sat Jan 25 22:15:08 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 688

This is obviously targeted. I guess there’s a reason why we’re rolling over?

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people   

Re: Sign number 4

By Vicky (Alan L.)25/1 22:33Sat Jan 25 22:33:37 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 679

Yes I'd agree with Jon there has to be some discussions going on that don't include involving the law -more's the pity - as the perpertrators clearly don't care about Casuals reputation or the decent individuals we have dealings with.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Sign number 4

By a krinkly25/1 21:26Sat Jan 25 21:26:35 2020In response to Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 675

Sounds like CCTV is needed.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Sign number 4

By Taimour (WeHateWombles)25/1 21:28Sat Jan 25 21:28:38 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 685

Corinthian Casuals Television?

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Sign number 4

By a krinkly25/1 21:33Sat Jan 25 21:33:38 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 695

Either that or we get our own permanent geostationary spysat with laser canon capabilities.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Sign number 4

By Paddy (Paddy1)25/1 22:42Sat Jan 25 22:42:01 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 664

reply to this article | return to the front page

   2 people dislike this 2 people

Re: Sign number 4

By MC26/1 10:37Sun Jan 26 10:37:03 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 591

Thought this was gonna be a thread about how we should put Simon Cooper on a contract

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people   

Re: Sign number 4

By a krinkly26/1 13:13Sun Jan 26 13:13:30 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 572

No but he's a perfect candidate to take over the Simon Huckle song, unless he has already?

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people   2 people dislike this 2 people

Re: Sign number 4

By BE27/1 15:22Mon Jan 27 15:22:37 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 459

CCTV is fairly cheap now and would be worth considering. CC do need to get their house in order too many idiotic people who are banned from Football but still are allowed to rule.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Sign number 4

By K's196027/1 16:30Mon Jan 27 16:30:56 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 402

Agree but will the authorities do anything about it ?

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Sign number 4

By BE27/1 16:40Mon Jan 27 16:40:28 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 432

CC could take out a private summons if they have evidence.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Re: Sign number 4

By K's196027/1 17:07Mon Jan 27 17:07:22 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 403

Indeed , but at what cost ? and would the culprits be prosecuted ?

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Sign number 4

By a krinkly27/1 17:14Mon Jan 27 17:14:05 2020In response to Re: Sign number 4Top of thread

Views: 437

The first stage surely is permanent banning from the ground.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   

Previous thread: SATS MATCH by tim26/1 19:42Sun Jan 26 19:42:19 2020view thread