The K's In Point
Newest article: Isthmian League - Premier Division result by Football Web PagesYesterday 21:46Yesterday at 21:46:14view thread
Oldest article: Glastonbury by reximus18/6/2022 18:38Sat Jun 18 18:38:54 2022view thread
Next thread: FOOTBALL tomorrow by Senior28/4 14:39Fri Apr 28 14:39:13 2023view thread
A review of 22/23
Views: 4767
This didn't pass muster as the report for Saturday, so rather than go to waste thought I would post in here...
Kingstonian 1 Hornchurch 2
So, 2022/23, that was… a season of football. A season that perhaps four or five times exceeded the utterly mediocre, and perhaps four or five times plummeted the depths of true despair. If anyone else can remember any of the rest of it in a year’s time, fair play. And if you know your Geneiro Maraghs from your Finlay Johnsons, and your Amine Sassis from your Junior Mboglems, you have my vote for Supporter of the Year.
Kingstonian got through three managers, used 57 players (at the last count), won precisely 11 matches (bleakly, just one of those in the cups), and finished six points and one place above the relegation zone. We drew six of our first eight league games, and three of our remaining 34. Or two of our last 25, if you prefer. Is any of this remotely interesting? I have no idea, but I don’t know what else to write about this absolute February of a season.
‘Home’ games were played in front of ever-dwindling crowds at a ground seven miles from Kingston’s town centre. Chanting behind the goal was at what must surely be an all-time low, so little to cheer about on the pitch, so little to cheer about off it. Only Corinthian-Casuals had a worse home record than K’s, and only Casuals scored fewer goals than our 21 in Mitcham, a fitting average of one per game. For all the many problems with Kingstonian playing at Mitcham, the impact it had on our home performances should not be ignored.
The Supporters Player of the Year award went to Iker Noguera Leon, an Academy prospect who made 13 appearances between mid-October and mid-February. Only the first ended in victory. He played the final four minutes.
In total, Leon was on the pitch for - I have actually worked this out - 421 league minutes, out of a possible 3780. It feels fitting someone who was part of one victory, and played just 11 per cent of the time, scooped the award. This is to take nothing away from Leon, clearly an exciting talent who was vital to the Under-18s’ successful season, but it serves as further proof barely anyone stood out in a season of not red-and-white, but interminable beige.
Besides the Under-18s’ success, there were some other positives. Simon Lane, for one, clearly a good man who quickly and decisively acted upon arriving in February, recognising the need for, more or less, an entirely new team. He assembled one that did the job with a game to spare, something that did not always look likely as Herne and Bowers mounted winter and then spring resistance.
Enfield away! Bognor away! Folkestone away! Casuals away (if only still home)! They were fun. That Casuals keeper being embarrassingly bad. That was fun/ny. Ibrahim Bangura’s banger at King George’s. That was great. Tyrese Owen looked a cut above, and is now playing a league above. Darnell Goater-Braithwaite injected some much-needed youthful urgency. Martyn Lee, Matt Drage and Tom Collins, people we actually recognised, returned and offered some link from the past to the present.
And, as ever, there was that one constant presence, a player of Kingsmeadow, of Fetcham, of King George’s, and then of Imperial Fields. There was one player who started the first game of the season, a scorching August Saturday in Margate, who started the last: Rob Tolfrey.
It remains to be seen whether our final fixture of 2022/23 - a 1-2 defeat to Hornchurch in which K’s played… quite well, actually - will be Tolfrey’s last in a Kingstonian shirt. He seemed to suggest it would be at full-time on Saturday, as he hugged the remaining home faithful (and make no mistake, never has the word faithful been more appropriate than this season), and gave his gloves to one supporter.
During the game Tolfrey, who turns 36 in August having been a mainstay between our posts across three different decades, made a couple of saves that were vintage Tolfs, his lightening reflexes leaving Hornchurch heads on hands, mouths agape.
Despite his best efforts, Tolfrey couldn’t quite prevent the Urchins’ winner crossing the line on the hour, completing a comeback for the league runners-up after Tom Collins’ early penalty, which he had won, put K’s ahead. If it is farewell, it was not the one he would have wanted; but then, I suppose, nor was this the season Kingstonian had wanted. Thank God it’s over.
reply to this article | return to the front page
21 people
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2985
Seriously
Shame this was rejected
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2604
Oh the report was banned? Because the regime don't like it man!
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people 
1 person
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2466
It's an interesting account of how you saw the season, but not a full match report, which I thought should include all goals. You write extremely well and I hope you do more match reports next season!
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people 3 people
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2391
He’d be too embarrassed to comment himself so if you’ll allow me…
Yes - a senior member of the communications team of Chelsea FC certainly can write well, among a lot of other professional comms skills!
Of course, this is a great example of the kind of expertise that the current board (or at least the majority of the current board) are too proud to accept they need. And, if I may be so bold, a good example of why calling KBH “young, inexperienced chaps” was so misguided.
reply to this article | return to the front page
11 people
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2331
I find it incredible, bordering on the completely surreal, that we, by which I mean the club ownership, feels comfortable and justified turning down that kind of expertise and skill set, in the position we find ourselves in.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2455
I’ve heard that some of the volunteers will be withdrawing their services for next season in protest at how the club is being run!
SACK THE BOARD
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people 2 people
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2636
Thanks Rupert. I had indeed forgotten much of this... It's a salutory reminder quite how disastrous Mitcham was last season and how desperately we need a different groundshare.
reply to this article | return to the front page
6 people
Re: A review of 22/23
Views: 2373
I have enjoyed the match reports throughout the season. Also the programme in general, the YouTube interviews and the away day guide. Thanks to those who have done all of these things throughout the season!
reply to this article | return to the front page
9 people
Previous thread: August 2023 by Taimour27/4 08:20Thu Apr 27 08:20:17 2023view thread