The K's In Point

Re: In the meantime

By Peter Borrett19/9/2023 17:23Tue Sep 19 17:23:13 2023In response to Re: In the meantime

Views: 2392

How can you translate me saying ‘it just amused me’ into ‘a temper tantrum’.? I honestly saw the funny side.
I didn’t attend the second agm as I was ( and still am ) in Italy. That point seems contrary to the idea that the new committee want to hear from all supporters whether they belong to the supporters club or not but you didn’t think I have the same rights because I didn’t attend the agm. Lastly, in your reply to Foley on Sunday you said the motion was’ voted massively in favour about 35 to 3 and he would have seen it if he had been there.
No he wouldn’t have done as the minutes show 24 for 3 against and 5 abstentations. Admittedly still a sizeable amount for those in attendance but in the bigger picture 24 out of about 140 members , in my opinion , needs further initiatives to obtain views. The old committee were within their remit to decide against postal votes and I did email John Bangs well in advance suggesting postal votes. It was a missed opportunity to obtain a stronger reflection of views.
Having said this I am encouraged by Rex’s views on consultation and Matts enthusiasm for the club shop. The committee need time to communicate further. Let’s hope this doesn’t proceed into a to and fro . Let’s get back to treating differing views with respect.

reply to this article | return to the front page

5 people    2 people