Re: Censorship
Views: 826
One example is the use of the AFC blood money to support the playing budget. Quite clearly this was an entirely valid use of the funds and was agreed with AFC who signed off on the use of those funds. Yet it is consistently insinuated that there was a misuse of the funds. Just one example.
This is quite a take… thinking it’s a misuse of funds is a valid opinion many hold (including apparently the current chairmen who said as much fyi), but it is the boards decision and a valid use of funds as has now been revealed.
What’s not insinuated and fact, is the board outright lied about the use of these funds for multiple years. That is misuse of positioning and the main factor, of which there others, as to why the club/fan relationship is so strained.
If is was an entirely valid use as well, why lie about it? We may never know because one side refuses to discuss it…
reply to this article | return to the front page
6 people
Censorship by Generic_K14/5/2024 20:57Tue May 14 20:57:18 2024 11 peopleview thread- Re: Censorship by Suom Ynona14/5/2024 23:06Tue May 14 23:06:14 2024 5 people
- Re: Censorship by Count Scarlioni15/5/2024 08:49Wed May 15 08:49:18 2024 3 people
1 person - Re: Censorship by Suom Ynona15/5/2024 09:31Wed May 15 09:31:52 2024 5 people
- Re: Censorship by Count Scarlioni15/5/2024 09:53Wed May 15 09:53:04 2024 4 people 4 people
- Re: Censorship by jon tolley15/5/2024 16:47Wed May 15 16:47:32 2024 10 people
- Re: Censorship by Count Scarlioni15/5/2024 23:07Wed May 15 23:07:22 2024 4 people 11 people
- Re: Censorship by jon tolley16/5/2024 09:23Thu May 16 09:23:44 2024 13 people
- Re: Censorship by PlayupKs16/5/2024 08:57Thu May 16 08:57:46 2024 4 people
- Re: Censorship by irishk16/5/2024 08:57Thu May 16 08:57:15 2024 3 people 1 person
- Re: Censorship by Damo16/5/2024 07:43Thu May 16 07:43:09 2024 3 people 1 person
- Re: Censorship by Filipo16/5/2024 09:20Thu May 16 09:20:19 2024 1 person
- Re: Censorship by PlayupKs15/5/2024 13:54Wed May 15 13:54:03 2024 6 people