Re: Censorship
Views: 934
One example is the use of the AFC blood money to support the playing budget. Quite clearly this was an entirely valid use of the funds and was agreed with AFC who signed off on the use of those funds. Yet it is consistently insinuated that there was a misuse of the funds. Just one example.
that's mad that one of the most contested decisions has been proclaimed to be "quite clear". we were lied to about this. now it may be that it's valid use of funds - I think it's a very wrong and irresponsible use of funds - but if it is a valid use, why did the board intentionally mislead fans on how this was being spent?
I ask this honestly, because all I can think is you don't understand the detail of this issue.
reply to this article | return to the front page
10 people
Next article in this thread: Re: Censorship by Count Scarlioni15/5/2024 23:07Wed May 15 23:07:22 2024
Censorship by Generic_K14/5/2024 20:57Tue May 14 20:57:18 2024 11 peopleview thread- Re: Censorship by Suom Ynona14/5/2024 23:06Tue May 14 23:06:14 2024 5 people
- Re: Censorship by Count Scarlioni15/5/2024 08:49Wed May 15 08:49:18 2024 3 people
1 person - Re: Censorship by Suom Ynona15/5/2024 09:31Wed May 15 09:31:52 2024 5 people
- Re: Censorship by Count Scarlioni15/5/2024 09:53Wed May 15 09:53:04 2024 4 people 4 people
- Re: Censorship by jon tolley15/5/2024 16:47Wed May 15 16:47:32 2024 10 people
- Re: Censorship by Count Scarlioni15/5/2024 23:07Wed May 15 23:07:22 2024 4 people 11 people
- Re: Censorship by jon tolley16/5/2024 09:23Thu May 16 09:23:44 2024 13 people
- Re: Censorship by PlayupKs16/5/2024 08:57Thu May 16 08:57:46 2024 4 people
- Re: Censorship by irishk16/5/2024 08:57Thu May 16 08:57:15 2024 3 people 1 person
- Re: Censorship by Damo16/5/2024 07:43Thu May 16 07:43:09 2024 3 people 1 person
- Re: Censorship by Filipo16/5/2024 09:20Thu May 16 09:20:19 2024 1 person
- Re: Censorship by PlayupKs15/5/2024 13:54Wed May 15 13:54:03 2024 6 people