Curiosity question
Views: 2661
When the Chairman is said to have told people to go forth and multiply there is outrage.
Yet, it seems to be "acceptable" to tell fellow supporters with different views the same and this is ok.
I don't get that.
Surely the idea of a forum is to share and debate ideas without resorting to personal abuse?
Otherwise, what is the difference between the current and perhaps future ownership?
I'm right and you're wrong and you can eff off if you don't agree with me doesn't seem to work, does it?
reply to this article | return to the front page
7 people
Next article in this thread: Re: Curiosity question by JM13/10/2024 13:21Sun Oct 13 13:21:01 2024
Curiosity question by PC Copper13/10/2024 12:56Sun Oct 13 12:56:19 2024 7 peopleview thread- Re: Curiosity question by JM13/10/2024 13:21Sun Oct 13 13:21:01 2024 1 person
- Re: Curiosity question by jon tolley13/10/2024 13:19Sun Oct 13 13:19:35 2024 14 people
- Re: Curiosity question by Korky114/10/2024 16:49Mon Oct 14 16:49:55 2024
- Re: Curiosity question by Cardiff Ks15/10/2024 23:23Tue Oct 15 23:23:19 2024 15 people
- Re: Curiosity question by Korky116/10/2024 19:44Wed Oct 16 19:44:23 2024
- Re: Curiosity question by Mike16/10/2024 12:02Wed Oct 16 12:02:54 2024 2 people
- Re: Curiosity question by BUTLER$ Naked Butler 16/10/2024 17:09Wed Oct 16 17:09:13 2024