The K's In Point

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Tonight. by PlayupKsToday 08:43Today at 08:43:12view thread

Oldest article: Glastonbury by reximus17/6/2023 22:32Sat Jun 17 22:32:18 2023view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Cultural vandalism"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Cultural vandalism

By Taimour (WeHateWombles)27/7/2023 19:14Thu Jul 27 19:14:23 2023In response to Re: Cultural vandalism

Views: 1005

I know Hayward isn't happy with Mitcham because, ironically, he told Anderson (who told me) it's "too far to travel to", hence he doesn't attend matches anymore.

Anderson also doesn't like Mitcham but, since he's stepped away, it probably doesn't bother him too much personally.

Yiorgios is perfectly happy at Mitcham, as is Fenwick. They see no urgency in moving, think the £17,000 rent is cheap and sufficient reason to remain while they chase unicorns (intermittent emails with Kingston Council) and will not countenance any alternative which "risks the southern league".

I also never get the impression that the Supporters Club Committee realise Mitcham is terminal for K's. We are entering a second season and the club is falling apart.

And, yes, part of the KBH plan was to invest money to get us out of Mitcham, to retain and grow the fanbase and stay alive while the ground search continues. That is very different to managed decline and disintegration.