The K's In Point

Re: Censorship

By Count Scarlioni15/5 23:07Wed May 15 23:07:22 2024In response to Re: Censorship

Views: 643

Oh this is rich.

Well there we have it! I don’t understand - according to you!
You just cannot accept there’s a different view to yours.

You are right. The directors at the time were wrong. I am wrong.

I don’t understand - because I don’t agree with you! Don’t you see I understand it very well and it is possible I can from a different view from yours?

Can’t you see that the use of the funds was legitimate and the board employed them for reasons they considered in the best interests of the club? AFC Wimbledon signed off on the expenditure.

Maybe the results of the expenditure was not to your tastes but sadly that does not mean the use was “wrong or irresponsible”.

As for what the directors said and did not say you have no right at Al to the information about what they decided and did not decide. You are a fan of a football club and the directors are not at all obliged to share the reasons and nature of the decisions they take with you or any other fan.

I am afraid that is the commercial reality and it is also increasingly obvious that the new board of directors are not really concerned about what you - or I - think about it.