The K's In Point

Re: Censorship

By irishk16/5 08:57Thu May 16 08:57:15 2024In response to Re: Censorship

Views: 589

I am afraid that there remains a distinction between abuse and constructive criticism.

Whatever has happened in the past does not now excuse abusive or threatening behaviour. I am sure we are agreed on that.

Whether or not behaviour is abusive or threatening is another matter but I can easily understand why the directors wish to draw a line under this and move forward more positively.

I think the directors of the club have made some of the decisions to which you refer validly and in what they considered the best interests of Kingstonian.

One example is the use of the AFC blood money to support the playing budget. Quite clearly this was an entirely valid use of the funds and was agreed with AFC who signed off on the use of those funds. Yet it is consistently insinuated that there was a misuse of the funds. Just one example.

You refer to the views of past managers but maybe it would be more pertinent to refer to the views of the present manager Scott Harris and of the eight players who recently signed for the club. One assumes that they have a somewhat more positive view of recent developments than many who post here.

The post above really puts forward the case for fan ownership.

Edited by irishk at 09:02:03 on 16th May 2024