The K's In Point

Return to front page

Newest article: Saturday's match v Lewes by www.kingstonian.comToday 12:00Today at 12:00:23view thread

Oldest article: Isthmian League - Premier Division result by Football Web Pages5/11/2022 14:55Sat Nov 5 14:55:04 2022view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: AGM - point of clarification by John Bangs18/9/2023 10:02Mon Sep 18 10:02:30 2023view thread

Today

By Senior (BE)16/9/2023 19:15Sat Sep 16 19:15:15 2023

Views: 989

A really poor performance in the second half. Waters as captain was shocking does not lead by example and Collins prancing around offers no threat. Expecting us to be better but certain players are letting us down. Endo in goal was barracked throughout the match and unfortunately made an error for their first goal.

Edited by BE at 19:15:51 on 16th September 2023

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Today

By JamieB (JBreeze)16/9/2023 20:20Sat Sep 16 20:20:32 2023In response to TodayTop of thread

Views: 884

Managed to convince two of my brothers and a mate to come today. Was embarrassing to say the least performance wise.

However they liked the vibe of our fanbase!

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Today

By Count Scarlioni16/9/2023 19:48Sat Sep 16 19:48:02 2023In response to TodayTop of thread

Views: 870

The board signed these players ergo they are to blame.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person   3 people dislike this 3 people

Re: Today

By Alastair16/9/2023 21:15Sat Sep 16 21:15:05 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 865

Of course the board are to blame.

Either we could be rubbish and still have £1m in the bank for a new ground, or we could be good and foolishly spending the Womble money rapidly.

Instead, due to their total and utter ineptitude, we have a dreadful football team AND ALSO no money in the bank.

So yeah, it is the board’s fault.

reply to this article | return to the front page

9 people like this 9 people   1 person dislikes this 1 person

Re: Today

By SDG (SDG (Ks))17/9/2023 07:47Sun Sep 17 07:47:42 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 759

I’m becoming more and more ambivalent as to whether I even want us to stay up. The Womble money is the only thing that can give us any hope of ever getting a ground, yet we’re frittering it away at an alarming rate. Why, just so we can limp on at step 3, just about staying up while playing in a ground miles from Kingston that most of us hate? What’s actually the point?

At least if we go down, a competitive budget costs a lot less and perhaps we can hold on to what’s left of our money. It would also bring a lot more suitable ground-sharing options into play, both by ending this ridiculous Southern League bogyeyman about Imber Court, and by bringing lower graded grounds like Raynes Park Vale and Molesey into play.

Edited by SDG (Ks) at 07:48:36 on 17th September 2023

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people   

Re: Today

By Taimour (WeHateWombles)17/9/2023 07:54Sun Sep 17 07:54:07 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 770

Someone asked me on Friday how i was so sure the AFC money was now below £700 000. Well, apart from the official accounts, let's not forget Mark Anderson said in a video interview with Jamie (two years ago?) that the money was down to £750 000. That tallied with the accounts a year later showing around £730 000. Now the newest accounts show another drawdown of £60 000.

It's disappearing. What's the plan?

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Today

By berlioz17/9/2023 20:22Sun Sep 17 20:22:47 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 573

The liabilities prior to the Wimbledon money was approx 100k and it’s noted which director had made the loans. Since 2017 it’s currently standing at 900k and went up to that amount when the afc money was received.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Today

By jon tolley17/9/2023 08:58Sun Sep 17 08:58:08 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 713

it can only be one of two things

there’s some great thing going on behind the scenes which requires no financial or other input from anyone else

or

£60k a year or so will give us at least till 2030 and by then crowds will be down to about 60 so no-one will care

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Re: Today

By Taimour (WeHateWombles)17/9/2023 09:03Sun Sep 17 09:03:47 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 721

I think another useful question for the SC committee would be what proportion of the £150 000 FA Cup money was extracted to repay loans and what was reinvested in the club.

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people   

Re: Today

By Korky117/9/2023 09:39Sun Sep 17 09:39:34 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 706

ARTICLE DELETED

Edited by gekins at 10:56:23 on 17th September 2023

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: Today

By Taimour (WeHateWombles)17/9/2023 10:13Sun Sep 17 10:13:58 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 674

The run to the 2nd round and £80 000 for football focus and highlights etc.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people   

Re: Today

By reximus17/9/2023 09:34Sun Sep 17 09:34:48 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 697

The same question could be asked of the £60,000 we received for Bilongo.

rex

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people   

Re: Today

By Korky117/9/2023 09:29Sun Sep 17 09:29:36 2023In response to Re: TodayTop of thread

Views: 684

What 150000 FA cup money ,to repay loans you say ? I wonder if Jim Cochrane was repaid his loan, I'll have to ask ,

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Previous thread: Saturday's match v Carshalton Athletic by www.kingstonian.com15/9/2023 12:01Fri Sep 15 12:01:00 2023view thread