The K's In Point
Newest article: Is it me... by IangToday 13:02Today at 13:02:49view thread
Oldest article: Isthmian League - Premier Division result by Football Web Pages11/4/2024 21:55Thu Apr 11 21:55:21 2024view thread
Next thread: New ground announcement by KsOllie10/4 15:13Thu Apr 10 15:13:35 2025view thread
Today
Views: 4438
Not enough words can do justice to how shit that was. Doubt we have enough points for the playoffs and can't see where the next points are coming from. Still, there are far bigger problems at the club anyway.
reply to this article | return to the front page
12 people 
1 person
Re: Today
Views: 3705
The manager brings in the players, chooses the "system" (albeit you'd need Cafu, Maldini and Beckenbauer to make it work), picks the team and is responsible for results.
Or is that conversation still "off limits"?
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Today
Views: 3718
A pathetic result in front of a dwindling amount of people who can even begin to care about this traveling circus.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Today
Views: 3955
Incredible that just a few years ago, we went from 2nd in January to finish 18th, with only 1 win, and 3 managers over the course of the season, and here we are, somehow managing to create a more pathetic end to a season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Today
Views: 4175
To lose 1-4 to a team who played with 10 men for over an hour is unforgivable.
If you get done by a smash & grab by the away team but you as the team with 11 players have laid siege to the away teams goal , hit the post, bar, keeper making saves then you’ve got to just hold your hands up.
But to actually slow the game down which is exactly what Rayners Lane wanted then play into Rayners Lane hands by constantly giving the ball away is just utter madness.
When a team who has 10 men you up the tempo & get the wingers involved it’s very simple stuff we did neither.
We didn’t even test their suspect GK at all.
Yet again defensive mix up’s cost us another 2 goals & this is now becoming a regular occurrence.
Something was very telling in Hayden’s & Ian Selley’s post match interviews after they had played K’s.
They both said “Scott plays lovely football but we all know how Scott sets his team up to play”
Very telling indeed………
reply to this article | return to the front page
9 people
Re: Today
Views: 3869
What X and FWP don't tell you is that they had no subs. A player went off injured when it was 1-1 and they played the rest of the game with 10 men. After the game, only Dean and Eddie came over to thank the fans.
_____________________________
with your shield or upon it
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Today
Views: 3838
Couldn't make it today due to work, and couldn't believe what I was hearing about this game.
I can however believe that last bit...
reply to this article | return to the front page
6 people
Re: Today
Views: 3885
Today was just a total joke.
I can accept freak results and such as that it is what football is.
However when you take the statement from a board member a couple of games ago about fans "wanting the team to lose" with a squad like this that love to jump the gun on X weakening our relationship with RPV who are mysteriously silent after such a statement. Bet they'll still be silent tonight after all but one player just walked past everyone behind the goal
It should also be noted that the attendance dropped today to 141 via headcount after that ludicrous statement.
------------------------------------
It's the Organs or the Craic, you can only serve one master
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Today
Views: 3834
It was definitely noticeable that there were far fewer people in attendance today. The club is dying.
reply to this article | return to the front page
10 people
Re: Today
Views: 3837
We lost to leatherhead 1-0 last week and they lost 10-0! to Uxbridge today. We go backwards 1-4 to a mid table team wirh ten men. If I was Surrey FA, I would be investigating both games.
I have the greatest respect for Scott and his team, but this is a capitulation. The Chairman has finally realised that the club cannot sustain promotion to level 3. Any bets on Scott and this team ending up at Leatherhead next season.?
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Today
Views: 3521
Do you think it was anything to do with the Leatherhead keeper injuring himself last week? They had a different keeper yesterday.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Today
Views: 3666
I honestly don't know and forgive me, I quoted us as losing to Leatherhead 0-1. It was actually 2-3.
However, Leatherhead have been one of the form teams as we close in on the end of the season, but 10-0?!!
Its unheard of and must be a record win/loss and is a really very strange result.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Today
Views: 4025
It was just bizarre. I don't know what to say. They literally didn't have enough players after 25mins to field a whole team, and from that moment onwards we lost 3-0!
We didn't even test their keeper, who as we know is not the safest pair of hands.
I don't know how we managed to be that bad. Can only assume something has gone wrong behind the scenes - I still can't figure out why we had a director posting that the fans didn't want us to win (or whatever) but can only imagine it was in response to some crisis of confidence or something. Not sure how it was the fans' fault today.
Ultimately we are still in the playoff positions and have to try to get over the line but we're bottom 4 in the form guide. I can't believe we are in this state.
reply to this article | return to the front page
7 people
Re: Today
Views: 4019
Something is definately up. Today was a farce. It will inevitably be more expensive if we go up (revenue may go up a bit, but costs will go up even more) and i haven’t seen any evidence that our current Directors would put their hands in their pockets to bridge the gap. I can only assume the Board have sent a message to Scott and the team. I believe the term used in American football is “tanking”.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Today
Views: 3849
Not sure I buy this theory - if that was our 'plan', surely we'd play a stronger team in the SSC game on Monday night
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Today
Views: 3976
Once again we change the back four personnel. PJ is not a centre half and should not be playing there. Bell had a nightmare game and the rest just couldn't be bothered. Scot has lost the plot and I feel he should make a statement as to why we have become so poor. The clown was wearing his red nose and seemed unpreturbed with the performance and will be head over arse with joy. If we cannot get results then somebody should take over the club sooner then later.
Edited by BE at 19:10:20 on 5th April 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
6 people
Re: Today
Views: 3544
I understand my old boss Jim Cochrane has twice approached the chairman with a view to taking the club back,with no response .At least you know he's a winner.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Today
Views: 3808
I understand my old boss Jim Cochrane has twice approached the chairman with a view to taking the club back,with no response .At least you know he's a winner.
I don’t George is going to give up control of the club anytime soon tbh, especially as he’s got people that has his support though anyone know who this mysterious Paul Forrester who has 25 shares of Ks. Just curious or am I asking too much. Seen all the other share holders at Ks recently including Ben Flatt at Leatherhead last week
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Today
Views: 3417
Ollie,don't get too down hearted,Jim spoke to Paul Forrester ,awaiting a response,he holds 20 percent of the shares.but don't think he's bothered to trade them.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Today
Views: 3201
Ollie,don't get too down hearted,Jim spoke to Paul Forrester ,awaiting a response,he holds 20 percent of the shares.but don't think he's bothered to trade them.
Of course Jim spoke to Paul Forrester, he’s going to speak to speak to all shareholders. Would be very odd not to. Regarding a email response, he’s not going to respond to your email with the greatest respect. Hate to break it to you.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Today
Views: 3985
I can remember the clown abusing Dowson when we beat 9 man Wingate & Finchley 1-0 at Kingsmeadow. He wasn't happy that we only won by a goal. He hasn't been so abusive to subsequent managers though. Almost as if it was personal.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Today
Views: 3812
I can’t believe it’s intentional, but I can’t believe it’s not. what a very strange situation
reply to this article | return to the front page
6 people
Re: Today
Views: 3702
"I can’t believe it’s intentional, but I can’t believe it’s not. what a very strange situation"
everything at Ks since 2017
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Today
Views: 3576
It looked to me like it may have been some kind of blackmail out on the pitch, I can't believe the difference in the pre and post Christmas teams.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Today
Views: 3996
To describe this as an intentional collapse seems unlikely. This team has shown a pattern of spectacular collapse going back to the early part of the season - RPV, Ashford Town etc.
For ref. we've conceded 4+ goals on 7 occasions in all competitions this season. It happened 8 times last year. Says a lot.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Today
Views: 3776
All this pales into insignificance when compared to the off field ongoing relentless demise of Kingstonian as a football club.
Ksuals
reply to this article | return to the front page
7 people
Re: Today
Views: 3631
It is sad to see this GREAT CLUB in this situation it's
not the end of the road just yet.
we supporters can still save the club, demonstrate
against the board maybe outside the ground.
Save OUR great club .
Time is running out.
A CALL TO ARMS.
THIS IS OUR CLUB.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Today
Views: 3701
At what stage in the future would the possible formation
of a new club become less of a talking point and more of
a reality.
Have we people in place who are able and willing to put
The hard yards in to achieve this.
A new club would start rock bottom of the pyramid so
finding somewhere to call home would obviously be top
priority and financing the project a close second.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people 1 person
Re: Today
Views: 3404
At what stage in the future would the possible formation of a new club become less of a talking point and more of a reality.
This summer.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Today
Views: 3777
The trouble is (old and gray) this board is not your normal quality of director who knows when their time is up and runs like the rats Anderson Winwright and Fenwick with their 30 pieces of silver,there is no silver left for these rats to plunder.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people 4 people
Previous thread: FAO YIORYOS by Filipo6/4 06:54Sun Apr 6 06:54:54 2025view thread